Melksham crashed to just 9 in Round 5 — a catastrophic return at $341.8k with a 50-point BE. His 44.5 average is now tracking below breakeven with zero cash generation, and at this premium FWD price he is actively destroying squad value. Sell immediately and redirect the cash before further price erosion locks you in.
Jake Melksham
FWDWill Graham
FWDDecision
Should I trade Jake Melksham?
Form, breakeven, and a comparable replacement weighed up.
Jake Melksham is a test for R11. Considered a fringe selection; if fit, likely competes with Cross for the final spot.
Jake Melksham has an ankle injury requiring a month off. Community notes this is concerning given his age and recovery time, and asks whether it is a sign of age-related recovery slowdown.
Jake Melksham suffered a rolled ankle in R5 vs Essendon, reducing him to a hobble early in the game. Recorded only 5 touches, 40% efficiency and 14 fantasy points. Worst milestone game performance; SC owners should monitor fitness.
Jake Melksham's R4 performance rated by community as better than CD data suggests — one prominent commenter argues Melksham had a better game than Jai Serong despite lower CD rating. Part of a breakout return to form.
Jake Melksham returned from limited VFL minutes to kick 4 goals in R4 vs Gold Coast in what multiple commenters called a Mark of the Year contender grab. Community view: he is aging in reverse and must not be left out of the side.
No community questions yet for Jake Melksham. Be the first to ask.