De Goey posted 98 in Collingwood's gutting 6-point loss to Sydney at the SCG — a genuine contest score in one of the tightest games of the round, not a garbage-time gift. He was Collingwood's best in the first half and that form has now backed up across two games (127 in R9, 98 in R10). Cash gen is positive at +$3,152/wk and the season average of 80.3 is moving the right direction. At $399.9k he's mid-pricer value with real scoring upside. Buy — the revival is real, the price hasn't caught up yet, and the next scoring burst could be huge.
Jordan De Goey
Jordan De Goey
MIDJack Graham
MIDDecision
Should I trade Jordan De Goey?
Form, breakeven, and a comparable replacement weighed up.
Recent intel
Jordan De Goey fantastic in R10 vs Sydney — elite in the first half in the middle. Community very positive about his returning form; multiple comments highlight he was one of the best players on ground before Steene went off.
Jordan De Goey rated as Collingwood's best player in their R9 loss to Geelong. Multiple commenters voted him alongside Pendles and Buller as one of the few standouts, though he faded in the second half as the team collapsed.
Jordan De Goey returned to good form in the first half but went missing with only 1 possession in the second half. Commenters note this pattern is typical - can dominate quarters but not sustainable across four. Hawks went to work on him in second half.
Jordan De Goey (COLL) listed as concussion assessment. Returns to training unclear but cited as a chance to play. Community mixed on whether he is needed.
Multiple comments in the Moore return thread note Jordan De Goey is well off his best form, with one noting he should be dropped in favour of Anderson, Parker, and Hayes. A second commenter agrees he is struggling but still considers him best-22.
What people are asking about Jordan De Goey
- Which Collingwood players should be dropped and who should come in after the heavy Round 9 loss to Geelong?105UnknownTop: Drop seniors, bring in youth (Allan, West, Hayes) (40%)