Skip to main content
PLAYERS / PATRICK DANGERFIELD
Updated 17 May 2026

Patrick Dangerfield

#135/166·Bye Rd 12·test - Leg/Calf (Test)
FWD
Price $326kBE 48Owned Bye Rd 12Avg 41.0
ROOKIEBIBLEVerdict
✕ AVOID

Dangerfield posted 81 in R9 — 31 above his 50 BE, his cleanest score since R6. The highlight reel play is generating buzz but the pattern since R6 remains: one decent score, one or two disasters. Cash gen is -$4,910/rd with price still falling. His 84 in R6 preceded a 31 in R7 and a 56 in R8. This is a pattern of managed appearances and visible limitation, not a genuine revival. Avoid — one good score doesn't fix a season of underperformance at $337.4k.

Signals1/3 · Weak alignment
Form
Stable
Trajectory
-$5k/wk
Consistency
Volatile
Recent formSeason avg 41
41
81
56
Comparable PicksWhy this comparison · Same primary position (FWD), ±$200k price band

Patrick Dangerfield

FWD

Jamie Elliott

FWD
Form
R1
33
R6
84
R7
31
R8
56
R9
81
R10
41
R5
46
R6
85
R7
62
R8
72
R9
70
R10
58
Pricing
Price$326k
Price$326k
Breakeven48
Breakeven48

Decision

Should I trade Patrick Dangerfield?

Form, breakeven, and a comparable replacement weighed up.

Intel feed

Recent intel

Breakout Signal· T3

Patrick Dangerfield featured in a highlight post on r/GeelongCats showing an athletic/acrobatic play. Community reaction very positive - Lady Gaga vibes and general excitement. Post indicates Dangerfield in good form with 5 comments engaging enthusiastically.

Community Intel· T3

Patrick Dangerfield placed in the F tier by Geelong fans following a poor performance in R7. Multiple comments suggest his form is a genuine concern for the Cats and their SC owners.

Community Intel· T3

Patrick Dangerfield (Danger) had a very poor performance in R7 against Port. Community widely commenting he looked like he was playing under an injury cloud, with managed minutes in the forward 50. Multiple high-score comments call for him to be rested or dropped, noting 1 touch in 3 quarters and visible disinterest.

Community Intel· T3

Patrick Dangerfield was heavily criticised for his effort and output in the Geelong vs Port Adelaide loss, described as "disinterested" with just one disposal at points. Community questioned his forward role and whether he should rotate through the midfield.

Community Intel· T3

Patrick Dangerfield (Danger) played effectively as a true forward in R6, staying closer to goal and creating space for Cameron. His return to form and positioning boosted the forward line structure.

Coaching Signal· T3

Patrick Dangerfield returned for Round 6 after being managed out of R5. Community excited about return, with comments suggesting a burst mid-body-crusher role for Danger. R6 match thread showed him active in the forward line.

No community questions yet for Patrick Dangerfield. Be the first to ask.