Long managed just 44 in Collingwood's 4-point away loss to the Bulldogs at Docklands — 5 points below his 49 BE in a one-possession game where every disposal mattered. At $333.8k with a 63.5 average and 47 games of history, he is a known quantity: a chronic underperformer whose cash gen has been negative all season at -$3,192/wk. The R8 92 against Hawthorn was the outlier, not the signal. In the other seven rounds he has scored under 50 five times. At this price and with negative cash gen bleeding $3k+ weekly, he is actively costing coaches who hold him. Sell and redirect to a player with positive trajectory.
PLAYERS / NED LONG
Updated 28 June 2026
Ned Long
#58/138
MID
Price $305kBE 45Owned —Avg 79.0
ROOKIEBIBLEVerdict
▼ SELL
Signals2/3 · Partial alignment
Form
StableTrajectory
-$4k/wkConsistency
ConsistentRecent formSeason avg 79
54▼
72▼
44▼
Comparable PicksWhy this comparison · Same primary position (MID), ±$200k price band
Ned Long
MIDSullivan Robey
MID—
—
Form
R9
66
R10
79
R11
44
R12
44
R15
72
R16
54
R10
91
R11
69
R12
92
R13
59
R14
37
R16
62
Pricing
Price$305k
Price$307k
Breakeven45
Breakeven45
Decision
Should I trade Ned Long?
Form, breakeven, and a comparable replacement weighed up.
Intel feed
Recent intel
Community Intel· T3
Ned Long described as disappointing in disposal terms but led the team in tackles. Community split - some see his pressure work as irreplaceable, others worried about his ceiling and consistency. Most agree he is a defensive-minded mid whose ceiling is limited.
No community questions yet for Ned Long. Be the first to ask.