Long managed just 44 in Collingwood's 4-point away loss to the Bulldogs at Docklands — 5 points below his 49 BE in a one-possession game where every disposal mattered. At $333.8k with a 63.5 average and 47 games of history, he is a known quantity: a chronic underperformer whose cash gen has been negative all season at -$3,192/wk. The R8 92 against Hawthorn was the outlier, not the signal. In the other seven rounds he has scored under 50 five times. At this price and with negative cash gen bleeding $3k+ weekly, he is actively costing coaches who hold him. Sell and redirect to a player with positive trajectory.
PLAYERS / NED LONG
Updated 9 June 2026
Ned Long
#98/143·Bye Rd 13
MID
Price $386kBE 57Owned 0%Bye Rd 13Avg 68.0
ROOKIEBIBLEVerdict
▼ SELL
Signals1/3 · Weak alignment
Form
DecliningTrajectory
-$1k/wkConsistency
ConsistentRecent formSeason avg 68
44▼
44▼
79▲
Comparable PicksWhy this comparison · Same primary position (MID), ±$200k price band
Ned Long
MIDJacob Hopper
MID—
—
Form
R6
70
R8
92
R9
66
R10
79
R11
44
R12
44
R7
81
R8
49
R9
56
R10
74
R11
77
R12
90
Pricing
Price$386k
Price$386k
Breakeven57
Breakeven57
Decision
Should I trade Ned Long?
Form, breakeven, and a comparable replacement weighed up.
Intel feed
Recent intel
Community Intel· T3
Ned Long described as disappointing in disposal terms but led the team in tackles. Community split - some see his pressure work as irreplaceable, others worried about his ceiling and consistency. Most agree he is a defensive-minded mid whose ceiling is limited.
No community questions yet for Ned Long. Be the first to ask.