Skip to main content
PLAYERS / TOM BLAMIRES
Updated 17 May 2026

Tom Blamires

#100/138·Bye Rd 12
MID
Price $285kBE 42Owned Bye Rd 12Avg 60.5
ROOKIEBIBLEVerdict
▼ SELL

Blamires put up 60 in a tight 8-point loss to Sydney at Docklands — above his 43 BE and cash gen is still running at an elite $10.3k per week. But this is his third week back after an omission, and North Melbourne selection instability means another axing is always one bad quarter away. The cash gen is real but the selection lottery is not worth riding. Sell and lock in the profit — do not let another omission decision get made for you.

Signals2/3 · Partial alignment
Form
Declining
Trajectory
+$9k/wk
Consistency
Consistent
Recent formSeason avg 61
36
60
59
Comparable PicksWhy this comparison · Same primary position (MID), ±$200k price band

Tom Blamires

MID

Campbell Chesser

MID
Form
R4
56
R5
79
R6
61
R8
59
R9
60
R10
36
R0
63
R1
54
R3
71
Pricing
Price$285k
Price$286k
Breakeven42
Breakeven42
Cash/wk+$9k
Cash/wk+$0k

Decision

Should I trade Tom Blamires?

Form, breakeven, and a comparable replacement weighed up.

Intel feed

Recent intel

Community Intel· T3

Tom Blamires identified as a must-trade player by SC community member, part of a struggling team with multiple underperformers that need replacing.

Community Intel· T3

Tom Blamires considered for trade-out but commenter notes he retains value even if dropped, unlike Farrow who should be prioritised first.

Community Intel· T3

Tom Blamires flagged for trade-out in i_m_stuck post alongside Farrow and Lindsay. Owner seeking DEF DPP replacements.

Community Intel· T3

Tom Blamires flagged as a definite trade-out target. Community owner describing him as one of two obvious upgrades needed with limited trades remaining.

Community Intel· T4

Multiple commenters confirm Blamires named to play this week (in for Wardlaw with illness). Community lean: hold at least one more week — "100% keep at least this week", lower BE than Jaques, useful DPP status.

Role Change· T3

Blamires named as a late inclusion for Round 7, replacing Wardlaw who was ruled out due to illness. Community reaction positive, noting he had been performing well and deserved selection.

Community Intel· T3

Tom Blamires (NMFC) not named again for R8. SC community debating whether to hold or trade; general view is hold for at least one more game given cash still to make, but vest/omission pattern is concerning.

Community Intel· T3

Tom Blamires was confirmed dropped from the North Melbourne squad for R7 according to community discussion, dampening SC loophole plans for coaches who had VC'd Bont.

Community Questions

What people are asking about Tom Blamires

Mentioned in
  • Should I captain Grundy this week, or is there a better option?
    B. GrundyRUCTop: Nick Daicos via VC-Gawn loop (45%)
    24
  • Should I trade in Petracca this week, and is he the right pick over Neale?
    C. PetraccaMIDTop: Wait — Trac BE is too high right now (58%)
    19
  • Should I trade in Jordan Clark or Luke Parker to replace Tom Stewart?
    J. ClarkDEFTop: Trade in Jordan Clark (75%)
    18
  • Should I trade out Rachele to Kozzie Pickett when doing so leaves only $34k in the bank?
    J. RacheleFWDTop: Do the trade, use your boosts (50%)
    15
  • Should I trade out Joyce this week given he is likely to be dropped with Gallop and Gardiner returning to Brisbane?
    D. JoyceDEFTop: Trade Joyce out now, upgrade to a premo (60%)
    14
  • Which 3 players should I trade out from Stewart, Jagga Smith, Noah Anderson, Bruhn, Grlj, Jai Serong, Jacques and Pou?
    J. SmithMIDTop: Trade Jagga + Serong, hold Grlj/Stewart/Bruhn (45%)
    11
  • When is the best time to trade in Tristan Xerri, or should I prioritise him over defence upgrades this week?
    T. XerriRUCTop: Bring in Xerri before round 14 (65%)
    11
  • Should I trade in Finn Callaghan this week, or are there higher-priority structural moves?
    F. CallaghanMIDTop: Fix structure/donuts first, then consider Callaghan (55%)
    11

Related Articles