Gresham's Averaging 54 Against a 35 Breakeven. Looks Like Cash Gen. The Registry Has Said Avoid Since Round 6.

A 54 average beating a 35 breakeven sounds like growth on paper. The price says otherwise: $237k and still falling.

This is the number keeping Gresham coaches in their chairs: 54 average, 35 BE, and he just posted 55 in Perth. Standard SuperCoach math says cash cow generating value. The registry has said avoid four times in a row. Someone is reading the numbers wrong — and it's not the registry.

Why coaches are still carrying Jade Gresham

Jade Gresham at $237k with a 35 BE looks like a player generating cash. The surface metric (avg > BE) is what most coaches are watching. He scored 55 last round, 20 above breakeven. Normal SC logic says: hold.

The market narrative confirming this: he's been at Essendon with a consistent forward role, he's rarely missed games, and 187 career games means he's not a selection risk. Coaches who picked him up before the season saw the R0 signal — role upgrade at ESS, 44 BE, cash gen potential — and built a narrative that hasn't fully updated.

What the registry is looking at that you're not

The avoid calls started at Round 6 — four rounds before the 55 in Perth that's keeping people in.

The price history tells the story the average hides. Gresham started the season at $298.5k. He is now at $237k. That's a $61.5k price drop across a season where his 54 average nominally beats his 35 breakeven. Cash gen this round: negative, at -$2,674 per week.

Here's how that happens: SC prices move on the 3-game rolling average relative to the current breakeven, not season average vs starting BE. Gresham's recent scoring pattern — 46, 25, 55 — averages 42. His current BE is 35. That looks fine, but the trajectory after the 25 in R8 (a blowout loss to Brisbane) and the flat 46 in R6 means his rolling average has been suppressed enough that the price has continued to slide. One above-BE score in Perth doesn't reverse four rounds of downward pressure.

At 187 career games, Gresham is not a cash cow. The ceiling a genuine rookie brings to that price point — exponential cash gen, real price upside — isn't there. He's a veteran FWD slot holding space that could hold a player with $20k–$50k of genuine growth still ahead of it.

The sunk cost trap keeping coaches in

The lock-in here is sunk cost: coaches who paid $291k in R6 and watched him fall to $237k are anchoring to the original price and waiting for a recovery the registry doesn't see coming. The 55 in Perth feels like the turn. The data says it's another flat score in a declining pattern.

Loss aversion keeps coaches in Gresham. The registry reads the price trend, the cash gen number, and the scoring floor. It has said avoid since Round 6. Four times. The verdict hasn't moved.

Cut him. Redeploy the $237k into a forward still generating.

Updated: June 2026. Data sourced from RookieBible intel registry.

Pre-briefed. Opinionated. The more you challenge it, the sharper it gets. Get the registry's full read on your forward line — chat with our coach →